Two California Ranked Choice Bills Will be Heard in Committee on April 23

The California State Senate Elections Committee will hear two bills involving ranked choice voting on April 23, Tuesday. One is SB 641, to allow ranked choice voting for special U.S. House and legislative elections. Read it here.

The other is SB 212, to let non-charter cities and non-charter counties used ranked choice voting for elections for their own officers. Currently charter cities and charter counties can do this, but not general law cities and counties. Here is the text.

State Senator Ben Allen (D-Santa Monica) is the sponsor of both bills.

U.S. District Court Will Hear West Virginia Local Initiative Case on April 19, Friday

A U.S. District Court in Clarksburg, West Virginia, will hear Hyman v City of Salem on Friday, April 19, at 12:30 pm. This is the case that challenges the action of the city of Salem. After a local initiative to decriminalize marijuana got enough valid signatures, it was still removed from the ballot, because the city believed that if the initiative passed, it would be null and void because the city did not have the authority to decriminalize marijuana.

The lawsuit argues that it violates due process for non-judicial government employees to refuse to certify an initiative, just because they don’t think the initiative would be legally binding if it passed. The plaintiffs argue that the city must allow the initiative on the ballot, and if it passes, then a court could decide whether it is valid. The election is in June so the matter will be settled quickly.

District of Columbia Statehood Bill Now Has 203 Co-Sponsors

HR 51, the bill in the U.S. House to make the District of Columbia a state, now has 203 co-sponsors. It has gained two co-sponsors so far in April.

By contrast, HR 1965, the bill Puerto Rico statehood bill introduced by Congressman Darren Soto, only has one co-sponsor.

HR 1681, the ballot access bill introduced by Congressman Justin Amash, has no co-sponsors.

HJR 7, the bill to abolish the electoral college, only has seven co-sponsors.

Eighth Circuit Hears Independent Candidate Petition Deadline Case

On April 16, the Eighth Circuit heard arguments in Moore v Thurston, 18-1382. The issue are various Arkansas deadlines relating to independent candidates (for office other than president). The case had been filed in 2014 and this is the second time it has been argued in the Eighth Circuit. UPDATE: here is a link to the audio of the 32-minute argument.

On January 25, 2018, the U.S. District Court ruled the March 1 petition deadline unconstitutional, and said that the plaintiff, Mark Moore, who was running as an independent in 2018 as well as in 2014, would be permitted to file his petition “on or before May 1, 2018.”

The 2019 session of the legislature then passed HB 1152, moving the non-presidential independent deadline to May 1. But the legislature did not change the deadline for independent candidates to file a declaration of candidacy, which now became several months earlier than the petition deadline.

The state appealed the U.S. District Court order, arguing that the District Court should not have permitted Moore to file his 2018 petition, because he had not filed a declaration of candidacy several months earlier. The state wants the Eighth Circuit to rule that the U.S. District Court should not have given this relief, because Moore’s original complaint had not challenged the declaration date. But of course, when Moore filed this case back in 2014, the declaration deadline and the petition deadline were on the same day, and he could not have predicted that the legislature would create separate deadlines for those two duties.

It appears likely that the Eighth Circuit will rule that the case is moot. If that happens, it would be up to future lawsuits to determine if the declaration of candidacy deadline for independent candidates is too early. The three judges on the Eighth Circuit panel are James Loken, Roger Wollman, and David Stras.

Missouri Constitution Party Member Outpolls Democrat in St. Charles Alderman Race

On April 2, St. Charles, Missouri, a city of 66,000, held municipal elections. In ward 9, a Constitution Party member, John Blazek, was one of three candidates. Even though the election was non-partisan, it was known that Blazek was a Constitution Party member, that the incumbent was a Republican, and that the third candidate was a Democrat.

Blazek placed second, ahead of the Democrat. See the returns here. Scroll down to ward 9, St. Charles. Blazek received 31%; the incumbent received 44%. Thanks to Frank Fluckiger for this news.