North Carolina State Court Enjoins Law on Party Labels for Judicial Candidates who Recently Changed Parties

On August 13, a state court in North Carolina struck down the law concerning partisan labels for judicial candidates. See this story. The story does not say if the law was struck down on due process grounds (because it was created after candidates had already filed for office), or on the substance of the law itself. Check back here for more details soon. UPDATE: here is the eleven-page Order. It is based not only on due process, but freedom of association. It says, “If a law gives some candidates for a specific race a party identifier, but not other candidates for the same race, that law imposes a burden on the associational rights of the candidates left unidentified…The burden on Plaintiff’s rights is also severe because it affects Plaintiff’s rights ‘at the most crucial stage in the election process, the instant before the vote is cast.’ Cook v Gralike, 531 U.S. 510, 525 (2001).”

There were technically two cases, one filed by Chris Anglin who is running for State Supreme Court, and one filed by Rebecca Edwards who is running for Superior Court. Anglin v State Board of Elections, Wake County, 18cvs-9748; and Edwards v State Board, 18cvs-9749.

The Intercept Article About Democrats Who Complain About Green Party Candidacy Yet Ignore Ranked Choice Voting

The Intercept has this excellent article about Democrats who complain about the Green Party running candidates in close elections, and yet who refuse to support any efforts for the cure. It focuses on the August 7 special congressional election this year in Ohio, and also the 2016 presidential election. The Intercept is an on-line news source established in 2014. The piece is by Briahna Gray, Senior Politics Editor of The Intercept, and reporter Zaid Jilani. Thanks to Rob Richie for the link.

Neal Simon Qualifies for Maryland Ballot as an Independent for U.S. Senate

The Maryland State Board of Elections announced on August 10 that independent candidate Neal Simon has enough valid signatures to be on the ballot for U.S. Senate. The requirement is 10,000 signatures; Simon submitted 17,000. See this story.

Simon is one of the nineteen candidates backed by Unite America (formerly the Centrist Project). He is also the first statewide independent candidate to take advantage of the 2017 liberalization of the ballot access law, which lowered the number of signatures from 1% of the registered voters (approximately 45,000 signatures) to exactly 10,000 signatures. That change was prompted by a lawsuit, Dorsey v Lamone, which received financial support from COFOE (the Coalition for Free & Equal Elections).