North Carolina State Board of Elections Removes Three Constitution Party Nominees from November Ballot

On June 21, the North Carolina State Board of Elections removed three Constitution Party nominees from the ballot, because they had run in major party primaries for the same office in May. Two are running for county office, and one for the State House of Representatives. Two had run and lost Republican primaries, and one had lost a Democratic primary.

Rick Hasen’s election law blog has a copy of the letter from the State Board, and Hasen also added commentary that the action was brazen and perhaps without precedent. This is because when the party nominated the candidates on June 16, there was no “sore loser” law affecting minor party candidates. The law forbidding such candidacies didn’t exist until June 20, the day the legislature overrode the Governor’s veto of SB 486.

The party will sue to restore ballot position for these three nominees.

The North Carolina Green Party, the other party that nominates by convention, will hold its nominating convention June 23.

Newsgrowl Asks Polling Firms Why They Aren’t Including Green and Libertarian Nominees for Governor of New York

Steve Goodale has written this piece for Newsgrowl, to learn and reveal why New York polling companies have not been including Howie Hawkins and Larry Sharpe in their gubernatorial polls. Hawkins is the Green nominee, and Sharpe is the Libertarian nominee. The real answer seems to be that the polling companies take orders from their news media customers as to whom to include.

No Republican is Running for Iowa Attorney General

Iowa elects an Attorney General to a four-year term this year. No Republican is running in this race. So far the only two candidates set for the November ballot are the Democratic incumbent and the Libertarian nominee. However, it is possible an independent might file. The petition requirement is only 1,500 signatures, with a deadline of August 17. Thanks to Independent Political Report for this news.

Rocky De La Fuente Files Supplemental Brief in Third Circuit, Explaining Why Case on Petitioners is not Moot Just Because State Says it Won’t Enforce It

On June 21, Rocky De La Fuente filed this short supplemental brief in the Third Circuit, explain why his ballot access case is not moot. The case involves the law that does not permit primary petitioners to work, unless they are registered into the same party as the candidate. The state had said it would no longer enforce the law, so the Third Circuit wanted briefs on whether or not the case is moot.