North Carolina Legislative Leaders Respond to Democratic Party’s Lawsuit Over Repeal of 2018 Judicial Primaries

On December 22, the defendants in North Carolina Democratic Party v Berger, m.d., 1:17cv-1113, filed their first response. This is the case concerning the recent law that abolishes primaries for judicial office. The Defendants say the legislature may repeal or amend the law in early 2018. Because the defendants are leaders of both houses of the legislature, this statement is meaningful. The legislature convenes on January 10, 2018.

Daily Kos Website Shows 2018 Primary Dates and Dates on Which Primary Candidates Must File

Daily Kos has this useful page that shows the date of each state’s 2018 primary, and also the date on which primary candidates must file. The chart does not have any information for deadlines for independent candidates or for new parties, or parties that nominate entirely by convention. Thanks to Adam Bonin for the link.

December 2017 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News
December 1, 2017 – Volume 33, Number 7

This issue was printed on blue paper.


Table of Contents

  1. GEORGIA LIBERTARIANS FILE LAWSUIT AGAINST NATION’S MOST RESTRICTIVE BALLOT ACCESS PETITION
  2. MAINE REFERENDUM TO SAVE RANKED CHOICE VOTING
  3. NINTH CIRCUIT RULES AGAINST INDEPENDENT PARTY
  4. HIGH COURT WILL HEAR MINNESOTA POLITICAL CLOTHES CASE
  5. FLORIDA VOTERS MAY BE ABLE TO VOTE ON WHETHER TO LET INDEPENDENTS VOTE IN PRIMARIES
  6. ILLINOIS LOSS
  7. 2018 PETITIONING
  8. PETITIONER RESIDENCY LAWSUITS
  9. PETITIONS CONCERNING TOP-TWO SYSTEM
  10. CALIFORNIA WILL INFORM INDEPENDENT VOTERS OF CHOICES
  11. OREGON DEMOCRATS MAINTAIN CLOSED PRIMARIES
  12. LAST TIME SOMEONE NOT A DEMOCRATIC OR REPUBLICAN NOMINEE WAS ELECTED TO A STATE LEGISLATURE
  13. SECOND MAINE LEGISLATOR JOINS GREEN PARTY
  14. MINOR PARTIES DO POORLY IN 2017 GUBERNATORIAL ELECTIONS
  15. NEW YORK CITY MAYOR ELECTION
  16. UTAH U.S. HOUSE VOTE
  17. MINOR PARTY PARTISAN WINS
  18. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

“Disobedient” Presidential Electors File Brief in Colorado Case

There are still three pending federal lawsuits over whether presidential electors have the freedom to vote for anyone they wish who meets the Constitutional qualifications. The California and Minnesota lawsuits are moving slowly, but the Colorado case is very active. On December 22, the presidential electors filed this interesting 22-page brief in their lawsuit, Baca v Colorado Department of State, 1:17cv-1937. The three plaintiff-electors are Polly Baca, Robert Nemanich, and Micheal Baca.

The brief reveals that two scholarly articles were published late last year, examining the question of whether the founding fathers intended that the electors should be permitted to vote for anyone who is qualified. They are: “The Constitutional Power of the Electoral College” by Michael Stokes Paulsen; and “Is the Uniform Faithful Presidential Electors Act Unconstitutional?” by Robert J. Delahunty.