On December 22, March Fong Eu died. She was California Secretary of State from 1974 to 1994. She pioneered the idea of letting individuals register to vote using a postcard form that did not need to be signed by anyone but the applicant. Previously, in all states, no one could register to vote without appearing in front of an election official and having the election official fill out the form. Thanks to several people for the news. Here is an obituary.
On December 22, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity must share its important documents with all members of the Commission. Dunlap v Presidential Advisory Commission, 1:17cv-2361. Here is the 24-page opinion. Matthew Dunlap, the plaintiff, is Secretary of State of Maine and one of the commission’s few Democratic members. Thanks to Rick Hasen for this news.
The Economist has this interesting article about a new method for predicting how a U.S. Supreme Court Justice will rule, based on the pitch of his or her voice when questioning attorneys at oral argument. If one scrolls down to the bottom of the article, one finds that the new method predicts that Justice Anthony Kennedy will rule against the state of Wisconsin in Gill v Whitford, the case over extreme partisan gerrymandering.
Of course, there are other more traditional reasons to expect that same result, including the fact that the Court recently took a second case on the same subject from Maryland. Thanks to How Appealing for the link.
On December 21, Jill Stein appeared on CNN’s “Outfront with Erin Burnett.” Here is a report about that interview in The Hill. This interview has been covered by many major news outlets.
Also, here is a link to a 45-minute interview with Stein by Robert Scheer of Truthdig.
This Salt Lake Tribune story points out that Rocky Anderson, Justice Party presidential nominee in 2012, was also at the famous Moscow dinner that Stein attended.
On December 21, U.S. District Court Lawrence Stengel held a status conference in Constitution Party of Pennsylvania v Cortes, 5:12cv-2726. As already reported, on December 13 the Third Circuit had issued a ruling in this case, casting doubt on whether the county distribution requirement for minor party and independent candidate statewide candidates is constitutional. It requires petitions for minor party and independent gubernatorial candidates to not only be signed by 5,000 signatures, but to have at least 250 signatures from each of ten counties. The Third Circuit had noted that such county distribution requirements have been ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court twice, and by at least ten lower court decisions from around the country.
On December 21, the minor parties suggested to Judge Stengel that his order from last year merely be changed to delete the county distribution requirement. The state said it needs two or three weeks to decide whether it accepts that idea. Judge Stengel then set a new status conference for January 10, 2018, at which it is likely this will be resolved. Of course Judge Stengel is free to make his own decision, in case both sides don’t agree. Or he might order a trial to determine whether the county distribution requirement can possibly be justified.
