Colorado State Court Rules that Presidential Electors Who Vote for Someone Other than the Person Expected Forfeit their Election

On December 13, a Colorado state court ruled that presidential electors who vote for someone other than the expected candidates automatically ceases to be a presidential elector. See the ruling here. The case is Williams v Baca.

According to this story, the Secretary of State says he will recommend criminal charges for any elector who votes differently than for the expected candidates.

Colorado election law 1-4-304 governs the meeting of presidential electors. They convene at noon in the Governor’s office.

All Presidential Election Returns Expected by Friday, December 16

The California Secretary of State’s webpage says the official election returns will be released on December 16, Friday. When that happens, it should be possible for all the presidential votes to be known nationwide.

Only on December 16 will the public know how many write-ins Bernie Sanders received in California, and how many Evan McMullin received in California. Those two bits of information are the most interesting election returns that are still unknown.

Wisconsin Recount Shows that Original Vote Tally was Very Inaccurate for Declared Write-in Candidates

An unexpected revelation from the Wisconsin presidential recount is that the original count was significantly inaccurate relative to declared write-in presidential candidates. The original count for the write-in candidates was much lower than the recounted votes.

Write-in candidate Evan McMullin’s original count was 9,998, but the recount credits him with 11,855. Thus the original count missed 18.6% of his votes.

The changes for the other declared write-ins presidential candidates were:

Michael Maturen went from 243 to 284.
Tom Hoefling went from 68 to 80.
Chris Keniston went from 58 to 67.
Cherunda Fox went from 44 to 47.
Emidio Soltysik, the Socialist Party nominee, went from 26 to 33.
Joseph Maldonado went from 3 to 4.
Marshall Schoenke, alone among the write-ins, dropped. He went from 3 to 1.

The changes for the ballot-listed candidates were far smaller, proportionately:

Donald Trump went from 1,404,440 to 1,405,284, a gain of 844.
Hillary Clinton went from 1,381,823 to 1,382,536, a gain of 713.
Gary Johnson went from 106,585 to 106,674, a gain of 89.
Jill Stein went from 31,006 to 31,072, a gain of 66.
Darrell Castle went from 12,156 to 12,162, a gain of 6.
Monica Moorehead went from 1,769 to 1,770, a gain of 1.
Rocky De La Fuente, along among the ballot-listed candidates, dropped, from 1,514 to 1,502.

Thanks to Walter Ziobro and Thomas Jones for this information.

New York Working Families Party Percentages for Statewide 2016 Nominees are Lowest Since 2004

The New York Working Families Party always cross-nominates Democratic nominees for statewide office. In 2016 it had the lowest percentages for its statewide nominees since 2004. The only two statewide races up in 2016 were President and U.S. Senate.

Working Families percentages for president in New York have been: 2000 1.30%; 2004 1.81%; 2008 2.09%; 2012 2.09%; 2016 1.83%.

For U.S. Senate: 2000 1.51%; 2004 2.52%; 2006 3.31%; 2010 (two races up) 4.00% and 4.05%; 2012 3.76%; 2016 3.28%.

The Working Families Party is still one of the largest vote-getting third parties in the nation.

New York Reform Party Unlikely to Remain Ballot-Qualified After 2018

In 2016, the New York Reform Party did not nominate anyone for President. For U.S. Senate, it only polled 17,680 votes. This showing suggests that the Reform Party won’t be able to poll as many as 50,000 votes for Governor in 2018. The party’s U.S. Senate candidate in 2016 was Wendy Long, who was also the Republican nominee and also the Conservative nominee.