Virgin Islands Supreme Court Rules Write-in Candidates are Bona Fide Candidates and May Request a Recount

On January 8, 2015, the Virgin Islands Supreme Court issued a 33-page opinion in Hansen v O’Reilly, 2014-0085. The case involves a write-in candidate for the Virgin Islands Senate in the November 4, 2014 election. Incumbent Senator Alicia “Chucky” Hansen, an independent candidate, had been removed from the ballot because an earlier decision of the Virgin Islands Supreme Court ruled that she is not eligible to run. Therefore, she filed as a write-in candidate.

The canvass of votes showed that she was not re-elected. She then asked for a recount, but the lower territorial court ruled that she is not a “candidate”, even though the Virgin Islands allows write-in votes and does not even require write-in candidates to file a write-in declaration of candidacy. Therefore, the lower court felt she had no right to request a recount.

The Virgin Islands Supreme Court reversed that finding, and said that write-in candidates are bona fide candidates. Page 17 says that write-ins for bona fide candidates must be counted, which is a helpful conclusion, although it is just dicta in this case, because Hansen’s write-ins had been counted. The Supreme Court noted that she actually campaigned, and voluntarily notified the Board of Elections of her write-in candidacy, even though there is no requirement that write-in candidates file any paperwork.

Unfortunately for Hansen, the Supreme Court still ruled that she is not entitled to a recount. It used a technicality to find that she is not entitled to a recount. The Board of Elections never formally granted her request for a recount. Instead, it did start to recount her votes, but was ordered to stop the recount, because the recount had never been formally authorized by the Board. The Supreme Court said Hansen should have sued the Board over its failure to formally authorize her recount. Of course, Hansen’s response to that is that it would be ridiculous to sue the Board when the Board was proceeding to recount her votes. Hansen says the Virgin Islands Supreme Court’s decision on that part of the case is so unfair, that she will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to overrule the Virgin Islands Supreme Court.

New York Bill to Let Voters Switch Parties Up to 25 Days Before a Primary

New York has long had the nation’s most restrictive law concerning when voters may switch from one particular party to another. Current law does not allow anyone to switch, and vote in the primary of the new party, unless the voter makes the change in the year before the primary. State Senator Daniel Squadron (D-New York city) has introduced SB 570. It would allow voters to change parties, and vote in the primary of the new party, as long as the change was made no later than 25 days before the primary.

New York Bill to Make Definition of “Political Party” More Restrictive

New York Assemblyman Gary Pretlow (D-Mt. Vernon) has introduced AB 838. It would alter the definition of “political party” from a group that got 50,000 votes for Governor, to a group that got 100,000 votes for Governor. If passed, it would take effect for elections starting in 2016. Thus, it would remove the Independence, Women’s Equality, and Stop Common Core Parties from the ballot.

Pretlow has been in the Assembly starting in 1992. In November 2014, no one ran against him, and he had the nomination of the Democratic Party and the Independence Party.