On May 11, the Commission on Presidential Debates filed this amicus curiae brief in Level the Playing Field v Federal Election Commission, 1:15cv-1397. This is one of the two pending cases over the rules for qualifying for the general election presidential debates.
The brief says that there are “scores” of presidential candidates every presidential election year. This is a phony point, because no one is challenging the CPD rule that says invited candidates must be on the ballot in enough states to theoretically win. in the entire history of the United States, there has never been a presidential election with more than seven candidates who had enough candidates for presidential elector to theoretically win. In 2012 there were only four such candidates.
The brief also that the purpose of the federal campaign laws is to prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption. The plaintiffs agree. The question, which the CPD completely ignores, is whether the large for-profit corporations who fund the Commission on Presidential Debates are currying favor with the two major party presidential candidates by their funding.