Judge Won’t Block Virginia Election Board from Asking Voters in Republican Presidential Primary to Say they are Republicans

On January 14, U.S. District Court Judge M. Hannah Lauck issued a four-page order, saying she won’t at this time stop Virginia election officials from using a sign-in sheet at the polls that says voters choosing a Republican ballot are Republicans. However, there will be a provisional Republican ballot for voters who refuse to sign that sign-in sheet. If the court later decides that the sign-in statement is illegal, those provisional ballots would be counted.

The case is Parson v Alcorn, e.d., 3:16cv-13. The court order depends mostly on past judicial decisions that say parties have freedom of association to determine who votes in their primaries.

There is no such statement for voters choosing a Democratic presidential primary ballot.

Tenth Circuit Sets Hearing Date for New Mexico Ballot Access Case

The Tenth Circuit will hear Parker v Duran, 15-2088, on Tuesday, March 8, at 9 a.m., in Denver. This is the case that challenges the number of signatures needed for an independent candidate in New Mexico. New Mexico requires all independent candidates to submit a petition of 3% of the last gubernatorial vote. No other state requires more signatures for independent candidates for statewide office, although Alabama is tied.

The plaintiff was an incumbent member of the Public Education Commission. He had been appointed. He wanted to remain on the commission, and he was an independent, so he was required to complete the petition. Although he came close, he did not succeed. If he had been a member of either a major or a minor party, his petition burden would have been substantially lower. The U.S. District Court upheld the 3% petition requirement.

Lawsuit Filed Against Pennsylvania Ballot Access Restrictions for Primary Candidates

On January 14, a lawsuit was filed against some Pennsylvania ballot access restrictions that pertain to primary election petitions. The lawsuit challenges the ban on out-of-state circulators for primary petitions. It also challenges the requirement that each sheet of a primary petition be notarized. And it challenges the law that says voters may sign only one petition for the same office.

The plaintiffs are Benezet Consulting LLC and Trenton Pool, who intend to collect signatures to get Rand Paul and perhaps other presidential candidates on the Pennsylvania presidential primary ballot. Pennsylvania primary petitions for statewide office need 2,000 signatures. They can only be circulated in a three-week period. This year, the period is January 26 to February 16. The Pennsylvania primary is April 26, 2016. The case is Benezet Consulting v Cortes, middle district, 1:16cv-74. It was assigned to Judge John E. Jones, Bush Jr. appointee.

The same three restrictions as applied to general election petitions were struck down in Pennsylvania on March 2, 2015, and the state did not appeal. That case was Green Party of Pennsylvania v Aichele, 89 F.Supp.3d 723 (eastern district). The only difference in the issues in the two cases are that one case pertains to primary petitions and the other to general election petitions; also the primary petition case challenges the law (not applicable to general elections) that the circulator must be registered in the same party as the candidate whose petition is being circulated.