Republican Candidate for California Secretary of State Again Says He Wants to Bring Back Write-ins

Pete Peterson, the Republican running for California Secretary of State, has now again said that he wants to restore write-in space to the general election ballot for Congress and partisan state office (California still has write-in space for all other offices). See this column by Peterson in Fox & Hounds. Peterson had said this earlier in a Secretary of State PPIC candidate forum in Sacramento on September 11.

Unfortunately, no newspaper in California has yet informed its readers of Peterson’s stand on this issue, or the fact that so far at least, his Democratic opponent, State Senator Alex Padilla, does not favor restoring write-in space. California and Louisiana are the only two states that ever had write-in space and then abolished it.

There will be a Secretary of State candidates’ debate in Berkeley, on Thursday, October 9, at 2299 Piedmont, Berkeley, adjacent to the U.C. Berkeley campus. The event is in International House, in the Chevron Auditorium, at 6:30 p.m. The event is free but registration in advance is required; use this link. Individuals who live in the San Francisco Bay Area may wish to attend. If members of the audience are allowed to ask questions, perhaps Senator Padilla can also be pressed on the write-in issue. If California were to restore write-ins, minor party members could continue campaigning during the general election season, by appealing for write-in votes.

The Peterson column weakly defends the top-two system, but Peterson kindly linked to two columns by Joe Mathews that make strong criticisms of California’s top-two system.

California voters defeated a top-two initiative in 2004, Proposition 62. Proposition 62 permitted write-ins, including write-ins for candidates who had run in the primary and failed to place first or second.

Idaho Holds Four-Candidate Gubernatorial Debate

On October 3, a debate was held between between four Idaho gubernatorial candidates: the Republican incumbent Butch Otter; the Democratic nominee A. J. Balukoff; the Libertarian nominee John T. Bujak; and an independent candidate whose legal name is Pro-Life (he changed his name about a decade ago and has run for office several times since then under his new name). See this story.

It is not known why two other gubernatorial candidates who are on the ballot did not participate in the debate. They are Constitution Party nominee Steve Pankey, and independent candidate Jill Humble.

Mitt Romney Accidentally Registered to Vote in Utah as an Independent Voter in August 2014

During August 2014, Mitt Romney filled out a new voter registration form in Holladay, Utah. He appears to have accidentally registered as an independent, by leaving the political party choice box empty. See this story, which has a picture of the form. He has since re-registered as a Republican. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.

Florida League of Women Voters Excludes Libertarians from its Voter Guide

The Florida League of Women Voters has published a Voters Guide, and it contains questions for the Democratic and Republican nominees for Governor and Attorney General, and their responses. It does not mention the Libertarian nominees for those offices, even though the Libertarian nominee for Governor, Adrian Wyllie, has been recently polling at 10%, and even though the Libertarian nominee for Attorney General is one of only three candidates on the ballot (the gubernatorial race also has two independent candidates).

See this story, which is mainly about the failure of any Florida debate sponsors to invite Wyllie into any debate. The commentary is by Michelle Ertel, political analyst for Channel 13 News. The article contains a link to the League’s Voters Guide, which says, “all candidates have been given the same word limit”, an untrue statement since some candidates have been given a zero-word limit.