Gallup Poll, for First Time, Shows Neither Major Party Viewed Favorably by As Much as 40% of the Electorate

On March 16, Gallup released this poll, asking voters whether they have a favorable or an unfavorable impression of the Democratic Party, and the same question for the Republican Party.  Gallup has been taking this poll starting in 1992.  For the first time in the history of this poll, neither major party registers a favorability rating of even 40%.  Many years ago, both major parties had positive ratings above 60%.

If the United States had nondiscriminatory election laws and practices relating to ballot access, debates, and campaign finance, it is obvious that new parties would arise and gain substantial support, just as they have in Great Britain and Canada.

Even now, the United States has a record number of one-state parties that are non-ideological and not associated with any particular interest group.  Independence Parties exist in Alabama, Florida,  Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, and South Carolina.  Parties named “Independent Party” exist in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, and Oregon.  The Moderate Party exists in Rhode Island.  South Carolina has a centrist party named “American Party.”  Massachusetts has a centrist party, the United Independent Party.  Colorado has a Unity Party.  Iowa has a New Independent American Party.  New Jersey has the D-R Party.  The United States had a centrist, non-ideological party called Americans Elect during 2010, 2011, and the early months of 2012, but it no longer exists.  In the past there were very few parties, either state or national, that were non-ideological and didn’t represent a particular interest group.  The birth and growth of such parties is a sign of the unhappiness with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.  Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.

Utah Election Laws Passed in 2014 Survive Attempts to Change Them

All bills in the 2015 session of the Utah legislature to undo the changes to party nominations have failed.  See this story.  Therefore, the 2014 system will continue, at least for a year.  The 2014 changes make it possible for a candidate to get on a primary ballot even without showing substantial support at a party caucus or convention.  Also, the 2014 changes require all parties to let independents vote in their primaries.

Two Past U.S. Solicitors General Publish in Harvard Law Review on Who is a Natural-Born Citizen

Paul Clement and Neal Katyal, both past Solicitors General for the United States government, have written this article on Article II’s provision that a president must be a natural-born citizen.  Apparently they were moved to write about this subject because U.S. Senator Ted Cruz is running for President and he was born in Canada.  Thanks to Howard Bashman for the link.