Georgia is holding two statewide partisan elections in November 2025 for Public Service Commission. Normally Georgia never holds partisan statewide elections in odd years. But the elections for that office were not held in 2022 nor 2024, due to litigation over whether they should be statewide or by district. The courts ruled in favor of statewide elections.

This will be the first statewide partisan election in Georgia since 1986 in which only the Democratic and Republican Parties are on the ballot. For all elections 1988 through 2024, the Libertarian Party was also on the ballot for statewide office (but not district office). The Libertarian Party went off the statewide ballot in November 2024, although it surely would have stayed on if only the Public Service Commission seats had been up. The party always got enough votes to remain on for that office. But nothing was on the statewide ballot in 2024 except president.

On May 19, the Federal Election Commission filed a brief in National Republican Senatorial Committee v Federal Election Commission, 24-3051. This is the case that challenges the federal law that limits how much money a party can spend on campaigns for its nominees if the party and the candidate coordinate with each other.

The FEC brief says the federal law is unconstitutional. Normally government attorneys defend the constitutionality of challenged laws, but in this case, both sides agree that the law should be struck down. The FEC recommends that the U.S. Supreme Court appoint an amicus curiae to defend the law.

On May 15, the U.S. Supreme Court again considered whether to hear Meadors v Erie County Board of Elections, 24-684. But it didn’t decide, and will consider it again on May 22. This is the case on New York’s May petition deadline for independent candidates. The Second Circuit had concluded that the case is moot, so now the chief issue in the case has been transformed into whether the case really was moot. Both sides in the Second Circuit (the plaintiff and also the Board of Elections) had agreed that it is not moot, because in 1969 the U.S. Supreme Court had said that constitutional ballot access cases are not moot just because the election is over.

The Supreme Court has considered this case at three of its conferences, and will do so again for a fourth time.