Honolulu City Council Passes Resolution Against Instant Runoff Voting Bill in Hawaii Legislature

On April 20, the Honolulu city council passed a resolution, urging the Hawaii legislature not to pass HB 638, the bill to use Instant Runoff Voting in special elections. It is ironic that the resolution was initiated by the member of the city council who was elected in a special election and who got only 14% of the vote. It is also telling that one city councilmember praised the 2005 election in Iraq, because that election used Proportional Representation. See this story.

HB 638 has passed both houses of the Hawaii legislature and is in conference committee on April 21.

Tampa Tribune Covers Amendment in Florida Bill that Vastly Increases Ballot Access Hurdle for Presidential Candidates

The Tampa Tribune has this story about the April 18 amendment to the omnibus election law bill that makes it vastly more difficult for the presidential candidate of a new party to get on the Florida ballot. The bill, HB 1355, passed second reading on the evening of April 20, and will probably receive a vote on third reading on April 21.

The reporter who wrote the story tried, but failed, to find out which legislator inserted the ballot access amendment.

Wisconsin Democrats Have Now Finished Recall Petitions Against Five Republican State Senators

According to this article, Wisconsin Democrats have finished collecting recall petition signatures in five State Senate districts so far this year. By contrast, Republicans have only finished one recall petition against a sitting Democratic State Senator.

State Senators are the only Wisconsin state officials who can be recalled this year. All the lower house legislators, and the Governor, were elected or re-elected in November 2010, so they can’t be recalled now. Recall petitions must be signed by a number of voters equal to 25% of the last gubernatorial vote in that district.

City of Tucson Wins Lawsuit, May Retain Partisan City Elections if it Wishes

On April 20, an Arizona State Court of Appeals reversed the lower court and ruled that if Tucson desires partisan elections for itself, it may have them. In 2009 the legislature had passed a law requiring all cities in the state to use non-partisan elections for city office, but the Court of Appeals ruled that the 2009 law violates the State Constitution. Here is the 24-page opinion, which is City of Tucson v State of Arizona, 2ca-cv2010-0083. The vote was 2-1.

The voters of Tucson had voted in favor of partisan city elections several years ago. No other city in Arizona uses partisan city elections. Generally, Democrats win Tucson elections for city office. UPDATE: this article in the Tucson Sentinel says the losing side is likely to appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court.

Missouri Ballot Access Bill Advances

On April 20, the Missouri House Rules Committee passed SB 282. The bill now moves to the House floor. Among many other unrelated changes, it permits an unqualified party to circulate a petition to qualify itself, without the need for that petition to list candidates for president and presidential elector. Of course, this makes it possible for the petition to be circulated before the group has chosen a presidential nominee.