California Legislator Declares Himself Opposed to "Top-Two Open Primary"

California Assemblymember Manuel Perez, a Democrat who represents Imperial County and eastern Riverside County, says in this newspaper interview that he opposes the “top-two open primary” that will be on the June 2010 ballot. He mentioned the lack of voter choices in November, if the proposal passes.

The interview appears in The Desert Sun, a Palm Springs daily newspaper that has carried commentary in favor of “top-two”, but which has so far declined to print a letter to the editor from a resident of the Palm Springs area who sent such a letter.

Extremely Restrictive South Carolina Ballot Access Bill Has Upcoming Hearing

The South Carolina Judiciary Committee will hear testimony on SB 590 on Tuesday, January 26, at 3 p.m, in room 105 of the Gressette Building. SB 590 says that independent candidate petitions may not be signed by people who voted in a primary. It also says that no one may vote if that person had not been registered to vote at least 30 days before the petition is submitted.

The bill had been introduced last year, but had not moved. An identical bill in the House, HB3746, had passed the House Judiciary Committee on April 22, 2009, but had not made further progress.

The bill would almost surely be held unconstitutional if it passed. South Carolina laws for independent candidates for district office are already so harsh, no independent candidate for U.S. House has ever qualified for a government-printed ballot in that state. The law requires 10,000 signatures for a U.S. House candidate. The U.S. Supreme Court said in Storer v Brown in 1974 that when a state combines a hefty petition requirement with a primary screenout, that the combination of the two means that courts should invalidate the law if the historical evidence shows that independent candidates rarely qualify.

South Carolina and North Carolina are the only two states in which no independent candidate for U.S. House has ever appeared on a government-printed ballot. The North Carolina independent petition procedure is under attack in federal court.

The part of SB 590 that says voters can’t sign unless they have been registered to vote for 30 days before the petition is clearly unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court summarily affirmed a 3-judge U.S. District Court in 1970 from New York. One of the holdings in that 1970 decision, Socialist Workers Party v Rockefeller, was that it is unconstitutional to bar newly-registered voters from signing petitions. Thanks to Bryan Sells for the news about the South Carolina bill.

Anyone checking past South Carolina election returns for Congress should be aware that in South Carolina, independent candidates are called “By petition” candidates, on the ballot and in the official election returns. There was an Independent Party on the ballot in South Carolina in the 1970’s, which had candidates for U.S. House, but those candidates were not independent candidates.

Former CIA Operations Officer Plans to Rebuild Reform Party in Maryland

Charles S. Faddis is a former Assistant Attorney General for Washington state, and also, for 20 years, was a CIA Operations officer. Between 2006 and 2008, he was Deputy Chief of the CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Center. He is also the author of “Beyond Repair” (a book about the CIA) and co-author of “Operation Hotel California”, and he has been a blogger on the Huffington Post. In this article, he says that he has decided to become active in the Reform Party and that he will attempt to re-build the party in his home state of Maryland.

Imagining a U.S. with 50 States of Equal Population

Ron Hogan has created a theoretical map of the United States, in which the nation has 50 states, and they each have populations of approximately 5,617,000 residents. The map appears on the blog “Popular Fidelity” and can be seen at this link. It’s just for fun, but iif it were real, it would result in a more egalitarian U.S. Senate and a fairer electoral college.