NJ Politicker Feature Story on Chris Daggett, Independent Gubernatorial Candidate

New Jersey Politicker, considered the leading source of political news in New Jersey, has this story on Chris Daggett in its August 18 issue. Daggett is an independent candidate in this year’s gubernatorial election who has qualified for public funding and who will be in the state government-sponsored TV debates.

The article compares Daggett with Angus King, who was elected Governor of Maine as an independent in 1994 (and re-elected as an independent in 1998). The story also interviews King.

The story fails to mention a big difference between Maine and New Jersey. Maine puts candidates on the general election ballot in alphabetical order, and uses an orderly office-group ballot format. When King was elected in 1994, there were four gubernatorial candidates on the ballot, listed neatly under the heading “For Governor.” Although King was last of the four listed candidates, it was easy to see his name.

By contrast, almost all New Jersey counties use a party-column ballot, in which the Democratic column is headed “Democratic” in big letters; ditto for the Republicans; and all other candidates are listed in a column headed “By petition” on the right-hand side of the ballot. Thus, there is no easy way for a voter to visually scan all the candidates for any particular office. Instead, the eye of an ordinary voter is only drawn to the part of the ballot reserved for Republican and Democratic columns. This is partly why no candidate for Governor of New Jersey, other than a Democrat or a Republican, has polled as much as 5% since 1913. New Jersey is the only state that gives party column headings to the qualified parties but no one else, but the New Jersey press seems completely oblivious of this.

The story mentions the Maine election of 1994 and says there were five gubernatorial candidates, but it does not mention that one of the five candidates was a write-in candidate. This year New Jersey has 12 candidates for Governor on the ballot.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Again Upholds Costs for Candidates Whose Petitions Are Rejected

On August 18, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court again upheld the unique Pennsylvania practice of charging candidates for the costs of removing them from the ballot. UPDATE: see this news story in the Wilkes-Barre newspaper. The Court issued a one-sentence order in the 2006 Green Party case, affirming that the Court’s prior opinion stands, and that the Green Party’s candidate for U.S. Senate in 2006 and his attorney must pay approximately $80,000 to the people who challenged their petition.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not issue any order in the parallel Nader case; it is still pending before them.

The refusal of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to ever have written a decision discussing the constitutional problems with the Pennsylvania system will perhaps bolster the pending federal court case against that system, which is pending in the eastern district. That case is called Constitution Party of Pennsylvania et al v Cortes.