Nader Opens 22 Campaign Offices

On October 14, at 11 a.m. local time, Ralph Nader supporters will hold press conferences at each of the 22 Nader campaign offices.

The west has nine Nader offices. They are in Berkeley, Ca.; Denver, Co.; Fresno, Ca.; Las Vegas, Nv.; Los Angeles, Ca.; Portland, Or.; Sacramento, Ca.; Salt Lake City, Ut.; and Santa Fe, N.M.

The south only has two: Gainesville, Florida; and Richmond, Va.

The midwest has five: Chicago, Il.; Cincinnati, Oh.; Lansing, Mi.; Madison, Wi.; and Minneapolis, Mn.

The east has six: Allentown, Pa; Morgantown, W.V.; Portland, Me.; Syracuse, N.Y.; Washington, D.C.; and Waterbury, Ct.

Arkansas Green Running for Legislature May Have Ballot-Listed Opponent After All

On October 10, former Arkansas State Representative Dwayne Dobbins filed a lawsuit to get on the November ballot as the Democratic nominee in the 39th State House district. Currently, the only ballot-listed candidate is the Green Party nominee, Richard Carroll. The lawsuit is in Pulaski County Circuit Court.

Dobbins won this year’s Democratic primary for that seat, but the Democratic Party had refused to certify him. He had earlier been in the legislature, but had resigned as part of a plea bargain. In exchange for resigning from the legislature, he had been allowed to plea bargain down to a misdemeanor charge. Dobbins’ wife had then been elected to his seat. This year, everyone had expected her to run for re-election, but she did not file, and he did file, at the very last instant before filing closed. If other Democrats had known he would be filing, they would have filed as well. Therefore, after his name had been removed from the November ballot, the Democrats had been left without a ballot-listed candidate, although two Democrats are running as write-in candidates. See this story.

Associated Press Story on McCain Endorsement by Reform Party is Misleading

On Saturday, October 11, friends and supporters of Frank MacKay held a meeting in Hicksville, New York, and endorsed John McCain for president. Frank MacKay is state chair of the Independence Party of New York, which has already nominated McCain for president.

Organizers of the meeting then put out a press release, saying that the meeting was a national meeting of the Reform Party. The press release said 27 states participated, but the press release did not mention that most of the people participating in the meeting who were not New Yorkers were participating via conference call.

The Reform Party is ballot-qualified in four states. The Florida, Louisiana and Mississippi Reform Parties participated in another national meeting of the Reform Party in Dallas on July 18-20. That meeting nominated Ted Weill for president. The Mississippi Reform Party certified Weill for the ballot. The Louisiana Reform Party attempted to do so, but was thwarted by the same circumstances that also caused the Libertarian and Socialist Parties to fail to get on the ballot for president. The Florida Reform Party decided not to place anyone on the ballot for president. And the Kansas Reform Party nominated Chuck Baldwin for president in June.

None of the ballot-qualified Reform Parties have any connection with the meeting in Hicksville, New York, that endorsed McCain. Nevertheless, the Associated Press naively reported that “The” Reform Party had endorsed McCain. The Associated Press story has a link to www.reformpartyusa-ag.org. That web page is controlled by Jerry Heinemann of West Virginia, who has his own faction of the national Reform Party, the “Reorganized” Reform Party. Heinemann does not support McCain for president. The AP story will probably be corrected soon to link to www.reformpartyusa.org, the webpage controlled by Frank MacKay. The original Reform Party webpage, www.reformparty.org, is controlled by the people who organized the Dallas national convention in July, but their webpage is currently not operating.

The AP story also says “The Reform Party was founded by supporters of Ross Perot’s presidential run in 1992.” That sentence is also misleading; it implies that the party was founded in 1992. The party was founded by Perot himself (he thought of the idea and he thought of the party name) in September 1995.

Here is the 5-page Texas court order from August 2008, saying that the Dallas convention is the actual national convention.

December Trial Set in Lawsuit Against Discriminatory Aspects of Connecticut Public Funding

On October 10, U.S. District Judge Stefan Underhill held another hearing in Green Party of Connecticut v Garfield, the case that challenges the discriminatory aspects of Connecticut’s public funding program for candidates for state office. Judge Underhill again denied motions for summary judgment, and ruled that a trial is needed. That trial will be in December, and the Judge hopes to rule in January 2009. Thanks to Caleb Kleppner for this news.

Connecticut’s public funding law requires independent candidates, and nominees of parties that did not poll a large vote in the last election, to submit petitions of 20% of the last vote cast, in order to qualify for full public funding. Such candidates must also obtain contributions from a substantial number of voters. By contrast, major party nominees only need to worry about obtaining contributions from that same number of donors.

Barr Seems Extremely Likely to Remain on Pennsylvania Ballot

As of late afternoon on October 10, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not issued a ruling in the case called In re the Substitute Nomination Certificate of Bob Barr as the Libertarian Candidate for President. Barr is on the ballot in Pennsylvania now, and absentee ballots with his name on it have already been mailed. Last month, the Commonwealth Court had kept Barr on the ballot. One presumes that if the Pennsylvania Supreme Court disagrees with the Commonwealth Court, that it would have acted by now. All the briefs have been before that Court since October 2.

The case against Barr depends on the concept that substitution is never supposed to take place unless the stand-in truly expects to be the ultimate nominee, at least originally. But the substitution process in Pennsylvania and other states, as used for minor party and independent presidential campaigns, has always been about putting a stand-in on the petition who knows that he or she is just a stand-in. The stand-in technique is a device to make it possible for a petition to circulate before the party has held its national convention.