Barr Sues Texas for Excusing Late Filing by Republican and Democratic Presidential Candidates

On September 16, Bob Barr and Wayne A. Root asked the Supreme Court of Texas to rule that the Texas Secretary of State had no authority to certify the Democratic and Republican presidential and vice-presidential nominees for the ballot. As is fairly well-known, the Texas law requires qualified parties to certify their national nominees by 5 p.m. of the 70th day before the general election, which was August 26. UPDATE: here is the text (preliminary non-text portions are not included).

Of course, the reason the major parties were late was because both of them held their national nominating conventions later than the deadline. The Democratic National Convention was underway when the deadline passed, but the party had not yet nominated Obama and Biden. The Republican National Convention was entirely beyond the deadline.

The petition for a writ of mandamus is quite poetic, quoting the famous passage from “A Man for All Seasons”: “What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?…And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?…This country’s planted thick with laws from coast to coast–Man’s laws, not God’s–and if you cut them down…d’you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then?”

There are Texas Supreme Court decisions that have put candidates on the ballot even though deadlines were not met, but they involved errors by party officials. In this case, party officials made no errors; they were simply unable to comply with the law. Lenora Fulani had filed a similar lawsuit in Indiana in 1988, since both the Democratic and Republican Parties had failed to file timely. In Fulani v Hogsett, the 7th circuit ruled that, since she was also listed on the ballot, she had standing to sue; but that she filed her lawsuit eleven weeks after the deadline had been missed, so was guilty of laches.

Judge Rules that McCain is Natural-Born

On September 16, U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled that John McCain is a natural-born citizen, eligible to be president. He also ruled that, even if he weren’t, the plaintiffs in Robinson v Bowen (08-cv-3836) did not have standing to challenge McCain’s ballot status. He said another presidential candidate running against McCain would have standing, but that even then, the case would only be ripe after the November election. The judge was aware that the California Supreme Court had ruled in 1968 that presidential candidates who are not eligible should not be on the ballot, but he didn’t discuss that in his 5-page opinion.

The plaintiffs in this case are supporters of Alan Keyes, so it is odd that Keyes did not join the case as a co-plaintiff. The plaintiff is a presidential elector candidate for Keyes, and he is also the (somewhat disputed) state chair of the American Independent Party of California.

Daily Kos Tracking Poll

The Daily Kos tracking poll for president, as of September 16, shows Obama 48%, McCain 44%, Nader 2%, Barr 2%, other 1%, undecided 3%. The poll breaks down the vote by various categories, such as age, sex, region, and party. Barr’s strongest showing by age category is 30-44 (4%), whereas Nader’s strongest showing by age category is older voters.

New York Independence Party Hopes to Elect a Congressman

The New York Independence Party’s candidate for 13th U.S. House district, Carmine Morano, is campaigning to win. Morano is a health insurance expert. See this City Hall News story about his campaign. The 13th district comprises Staten Island and part of Brooklyn. The incumbent Republican, Vito Fossella, is not running for re-election. The district is fairly even balanced between Democrats and Republicans, so the winner in this district will probably be someone who polled substantially less than a majority.

Louisiana Ballot Access Hearing Set for September 16 in Louisiana

A U.S. District Court Judge in Louisiana has set a hearing (by telephone) in Libertarian Party & Socialist Party v Dardenne, the presidential ballot access case. The hearing is Tuesday, September 16, at noon, central time.

In a related case, Brian Moore filed his case against Mississippi on September 16. Both the Louisiana and Mississippi cases involve disputes about whether state elections officials should have accepted paperwork. Both states say the various campaigns were too late.