Nine Senators Introduce Bill to Permit Voter Registration in VA Facilities

On July 22, nine U.S. Senators, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, introduced S.3308, to require the Veterans Administration to permit voter registration drives in its facilities. The VA operates 155 medical centers, 135 nursing homes, 717 ambulatory care and outpatient clinics, 45 residential rehabilitation programs, and 289 nonmedical vet centers. Voter registration activities are prohibited in all of them.

Earlier this month, Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz and Connecticut’s Attorney General Richard Blumenthal were turned away from the doors of a VA facility in Connecticut, when they wished to enter to register residents of that facility.

Senator Reid said, “We must make it as easy as possible for all people to vote”, when he co-sponsored the bill. Reid seldom co-sponsors bills. The lead sponsors are Dianne Feinstein (D-Ca.) and John Kerry (D-Mass.). The other co-sponsors are Hillary Clinton, Patrick Leahy, Patty Murray, Barack Obama, Charles Schumer, and Ron Wyden, all Democrats. Thanks to ElectionLawBlog for this news.

Nader v Blackwell Argued in 6th Circuit

On July 22, the 6th circuit heard arguments in Nader v Blackwell. This case is unusual, because it concerns personal liability for an elections official, Ken Blackwell, former Ohio Secretary of State. Nader charges that when Blackwell permitted initiative circulators to hire out-of-state circulators in 2004, and simultaneously refused to let Nader hire out-of-state circulators, that conduct (which kept Nader off the ballot in 2004) arises to an injury for which Blackwell should be held accountable. The case is Nader v Blackwell, 07-4350. The three judges were Danny J. Boggs (a Reagan appointee), and Eric L. Clay and Karen Moore (Clinton appointees). The judges seemed interested in the case but it is difficult to predict how they will rule. Ohio law at the time forbade out-of-state circulators for both independent candidates and initiative petitions.

Ralph Nader is unique in the history of U.S. ballot access, for trying to redress wrongs that were done to him and his voters. Other presidential candidates who were kept off ballots, such as Henry Wallace in 1948, Eugene McCarthy in 1976, and John Anderson in 1980, were content to fight to keep themselves on various ballots. But they never took legal action of their own after the election to redress harms they had suffered. Only Nader has done that, most notably in his lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee, plus his complaint against the DNC filed with the Federal Election Commission, and also this particular Ohio lawsuit.

Ohio Attorney General's Race Likely to be 3-Way

On July 22, the Ohio Republican Party finally let it be known that it will nominate a candidate for Attorney General, in this November’s special election. He is D. Michael Crites. The Democrats already chose their nominee, State Treasurer Richard Cordray. The third name on the ballot is Robert Owens, state chair of the Constitution Party, who will not have any ballot label next to his name.

Ohio Attorney General’s Race Likely to be 3-Way

On July 22, the Ohio Republican Party finally let it be known that it will nominate a candidate for Attorney General, in this November’s special election. He is D. Michael Crites. The Democrats already chose their nominee, State Treasurer Richard Cordray. The third name on the ballot is Robert Owens, state chair of the Constitution Party, who will not have any ballot label next to his name.

ACLU Sues Alabama Over Arbitrary Behavior on Ex-Felon Disenfranchisement

On July 22, the ACLU sued the Alabama Secretary of State, and county elections officials, over their arbitrary decisions over which crimes are serious enough to cause disenfranchisement of ex-felons. The Alabama Constitution says persons convicted of “moral turpitude” may not be registered, but no one knows which crimes that term includes. The lawsuit also attacks a state policy that awards a “voting pardon” on completion of a sentence, but only permits this pardon if that person paid all pending fines and restitution orders. The case is Baker v Chapman, state court, Montgomery.