On September 5, a 3-judge U.S. District Court in Alabama struck down the state’s new U.S. House redistricting plan. The state then asked for a stay. Now the voter-plaintiffs who won the case have filed a brief explaining why the court should not stay its own opinion. Singleton v Allen, n.d., 2:21cv-1291.
The brief argues that the map proposed by the voter-plaintiffs is not a “racial gerrymander” because it conforms to the traditional characteristics of an acceptable plan, plus having the virtue of promoting fair representation for Black voters.
It is extremely likely that the U.S. District Court will not stay its own decision. At that point the state will ask the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay.