Faye Coffield Files Brief in Georgia Ballot Access Case

On November 26, independent U.S. House candidate Faye Coffield filed her brief in U.S. District Court in Georgia, asking that the Georgia ballot access law for independent candidates for U.S. House be declared unconstitutional. Coffield v Williams, 1:08-cv-2755. The state does not dispute the evidence. No independent candidate for U.S. House has overcome the 5% (of the number of registered voters) petition requirement since 1964. No independent candidate for U.S. House, anywhere in the nation, has ever overcome a petition requirement greater than 12,919 signatures. Yet Georgia law required Coffield to submit almost 15,000 valid signatures.

On the one hand, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Georgia’s 5% petition requirement in 1971, noting that the 5% petition requirement had been used successfully in both 1966 and 1968 (for the Republican candidate for Governor in 1966, and by George Wallace for president in 1968). On the other hand, in 1974 the U.S. Supreme Court said, “There is no litmus test” to determine if a ballot access law is constitutional or not, but that courts should determine how often a ballot access law is used, to know if it is constitutional. In 2008, three justices of the U.S. Supreme Court again reiterated that old test from 1974, which seems to show the Court still means what it had said in 1974.

The Coffield case is financed by donations to the Coalition for Free & Open Elections (COFOE). COFOE is also helping with challenges to other independent candidate petition requirements for U.S. House, in Illinois, Alabama, and North Carolina. COFOE greatly appreciates donations for these cases. If you wish to join COFOE ($25 minimum annual membership) your dues money is spent entirely on these and similar lawsuits. Also you receive a free subscription to the printed Ballot Access News. The December 1 issue, now in the postal mail to subscribers, has the number of registered voters in each party in each state. It has the presidential vote, by state, for the 9 presidential candidates who were on the ballot in more than three states. It has the 2010 petitioning requirements and deadlines, and shows which parties are ballot-qualified in each state. Please consider joining COFOE. Send a check made out to COFOE, to PO Box 470296, San Francisco Ca 94147.


Comments

Faye Coffield Files Brief in Georgia Ballot Access Case — 5 Comments

  1. One more chance for genius lawyers to bring up —

    SEPARATE IS NOT EQUAL.
    Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954

    Was the EQUAL Protection Clause added to even protect black and white Republicans in the ex-slave States from *political* discrimination ??? Duh.

    EQUAL nominating petitions.
    P.R. and A.V.

    All so very difficult in this New Age of armies of MORONS in legislative bodies, in executive offices and in the courts.

  2. If all candidates had to qualify as individuals, how long do you think the legislature would keep the 5% standard?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.