New York Governor Signs Bill Making it Easier for Parties to Expel Members

New York law has long permitted political parties to expel members believed not to be in sympathy with the party’s principles.  But the law always required that action to be carried out by the party’s county committee.  On December 19. 2025, New York Governor Kathy Hochul signed S7111.  It allows the expulsions to be carried out even if the party doesn’t have a county committee.

The Working Families Party typically does not have county committees.  The bill was introduced at the request of the WFP.  The expulsion power makes it easier for a party to prevent having its primary invaded by candidates who are not loyal to the party’s ideas, and who are merely hoping to seize the party’s nomination for a public office for partisan reasons.

Texas State Appeals Court Will Hear Appeal of Candidate Rejected from Republican Primary Ballot for Minuscule Paperwork Flaw

David Rogers, a Republican candidate for Texas Supreme Court, will have his ballot access case heard in the Texas State Appeals Court in Dallas.  Rogers v Republican Party, 05-25-01701-cv.  Candidates for Supreme Court in primaries need 50 signatures in each of the 15 state appeals court districts.  On one of Rogers’ petitions the notary filled in a blank space incorrectly.  The lower court first put him back on the ballot but then changed her mind.

The Guardian Story on Working Families Party

The Guardian has this story about the Working Families Party.  The party has 100 staff members and is now organized in 18 states.  In partisan elections it continues its policy of generally nominating candidates who are also Democratic Party nominees.  But it frequently intervenes in Democratic primaries.  It does run its own nominees in non-partisan elections, and in jurisdictions with limited voting.  Limited voting systems prevent any party from running nominees for all the seats up.

North Carolina State Court of Appeals is Pondering “Free” Phrase in State Constitution, and Whether it Prohibits Gerrymandering

The Carolina Journal has this interesting article about a pending lawsuit in the North Carolina State Court of Appeals, on whether the state constitution prohibits gerrymandering.  The state constitution says all elections shall be “free.”  Bard v North Carolina State Board of Elections, COA24-1109.

Thirty state constitutions say that elections must be free and equal, or sometimes they just say they must be “free”.  Generally lawsuits filed to strike down unfair election rules seldom win on the basis of that phrase.  Judges appear to find that it is too vague.