Tucson Daily Newspaper Carries Op-Ed, Criticizing Arizona Ballot Access

The Arizona Daily Star, daily newspaper for Tucson, has this op-ed, criticizing Arizona ballot access requirements for minor parties. It focuses on the Green Party’s loss of qualified status. The op-ed does not say that the petition deadline for the party to get back on the ballot is in two days, and the party has not finished its petition, which requires approximately 37,000 signatures.

It is expected that the Green Party will sue the state over that extremely early petition deadline. The Green Party did have a lawsuit in 2014 over the deadline that existed that year, which was in February of the election year. That lawsuit failed because the attorney for the Green Party did not submit any evidence that the early deadline injured the party. He had assumed that he could win the case on precedents. The new lawsuit will not make that legal error.

The legislature moved the petition deadline from February of the election year, to November of the year before the election, early in 2019.

South Carolina State Court is Taking a Long Time to Decide if Republican Presidential Primary Will be Held

On October 18, a South Carolina state circuit court heard oral arguments in Inglis v Heindel, 2019-cp-4005486. The issue is whether the Republican presidential primary will be held in February. The state party rules say only the state convention may cancel a presidential primary. But the state executive committee, not the state convention, cancelled the primary.

It is odd that the court is taking so long to issue an opinion.

November 2019 Ballot Access News Print Edition

Ballot Access News

This issue was printed on white paper.


Table of Contents

  1. U.S. SUPREME COURT WON’T HEAR ALABAMA BALLOT ACCESS CASE, DESPITE EXTREME CIRCUIT SPLIT
  2. AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY SAVED BY VETO
  3. “FAITHLESS ELECTOR” CASES REACH SUPREME COURT
  4. OHIO LIBERTARIANS LIKELY TO WIN ON ELECTION COMMISSION
  5. PENNSYLVANIA STRAIGHT-TICKET DEVICE IN DANGER
  6. CALIFORNIA TAX RETURNS-BALLOT LAW
  7. OTHER LAWSUIT NEWS
  8. NEW YORK EASES DEADLINE FOR VOTERS TO SWITCH PARTIES
  9. ALTERNATE VOTING SYSTEMS NEWS
  10. CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR VETOES BILL THAT HURT INITIATIVES
  11. GENERAL ELECTION DEBATES SET
  12. 2020 PETITIONING FOR PRESIDENT
  13. SUPREME COURT REFUSALS TO HEAR BALLOT ACCESS CASES, 1992-2019
  14. DON BLANKENSHIP WILL ACCEPT CONSTITUTION PARTY NOMINATION
  15. INDEPENDENT PARTY LEGISLATOR FACES LOUISIANA RUNOFF
  16. COMMON SENSE PARTY FAILS TO QUALIFY FOR CALIFORNIA BALLOT
  17. HILLARY CLINTON ATTACKS MINOR PARTY AND INDEPENDENT CANDIDATES
  18. TUNISIA ELECTS AN INDEPENDENT PRESIDENT
  19. NEW HOPE FOR PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION IN CANADA
  20. APPROVAL VOTING PARTY
  21. SUBSCRIBING TO BAN WITH PAYPAL

U.S. Supreme Court Sets Conference Date for Election Law Cases from California and Washington

The U.S. Supreme Court conference of December 13, 2019, will consider whether to hear De La Fuente v Padilla, and Chiafalo v State.  The De La Fuente lawsuit, 19-524, challenges the California independent presidential petition requirement of almost 200,000 signatures to be collected in 105 days.  The Chiafalo lawsuit, 19-465, is whether the Constitution permits the state to fine presidential electors $1,000 if they vote for someone other than the candidate who got the most popular votes in that state.

The Court won’t release information about its decisions until Monday, December 16, at the earliest.