South Carolina Republican Voters Sue Party over Cancellation of 2020 Presidential Primary

On October 1, two voters affiliated with the South Carolina Republican Party filed a lawsuit in state court against the state Republican Party. The party executive committee cancelled the presidential primary on September 7. The lawsuit points out that the state party rules clearly say that only the state convention can make that decision. See this story. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.

UPDATE: the case is Inglis v South Carolina Republican Party, filed in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, 5th jud. circuit.

Final Brief Filed in Illinois Ballot Access Case

On September 27, the final brief was filed in Gill v Scholz in the Seventh Circuit. This is the case that challenges the 5% (of the last vote cast) petition for U.S. House candidates in the general election. The U.S. District Court had enjoined the law and allowed the plaintiff, independent candidate David Gill, to be on the ballot in 2016. Then the Seventh Circuit countermanded the relief with a single sentence, but did not explain why. After the election, the case was re-assigned to another U.S. District Court Judge, who upheld the 5% petition. Now the case is in the Seventh Circuit.

Montana Governor Steve Bullock Will Apply for Primary Season Matching Funds

Montana Governor Steve Bullock is one of the lesser-known candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination. This story says he will apply for primary season matching funds. He hasn’t filed yet, however. He is the only person running for president, other than Howie Hawkins of the Green Party, who intends to file. Most presidential candidates nowadays don’t file for primary season matching funds because they then face limits on how much money they can spend in each state. Thanks to Political Wire for the link.

Opponents of Seattle’s Voucher System of Public Funding of Campaigns Turn to U.S. Supreme Court

On July 11, 2019, the Washington State Supreme Court upheld Seattle’s voucher-system of public funding of candidates for city council. Elster v City of Seattle, 96660-5. Here is the opinion, which is short. Seattle gives every registered voter a voucher, which can be used by the voter to help any candidate. The voucher is worth $25. Some taxpayers sued, saying the system violates their First Amendment rights, because their tax money goes to some candidates whom those taxpayers disagree with. But the Washington Supreme Court noted that the U.S. Supreme Court had upheld public funding paid for by tax dollars in 1976 in Buckley v Valeo.

The Seattle plaintiffs are preparing a cert petition to the U.S. Supreme Court in this case. It would have been due October 9, but they have obtained permission for a later deadline, and the petition is now due November 8, 2019. 19A345.