West Virginia Constitution Party Files U.S. Senate Petition on July 24

The West Virginia Constitution Party will file approximately 11,700 signatures in West Virginia on July 24. The requirement is 4,537. The petition is to be on the ballot for U.S. Senate. The party has never been ballot-qualified in West Virginia before, because that requires polling 1% for Governor, and it has never done that. Therefore, it must constantly petition.

The nominee is Don Blankenship, who ran in this year’s Republican primary for U.S. Senate. The law banning “sore losers” was unclear until this year, when the legislature passed HB 4434, which says that no one can be on the general election ballot as an independent candidate or the nominee of an unqualified party if he or she was registered in a major party earlier that year. But that new law didn’t go into effect until after Blankenship had started collecting signatures, and the party will argue that due process does not permit a state to make ballot access more restrictive in the middle of the petitioning period.

Willie Wilson, Democratic Presidential Candidate in 2016, and Chicago Mayoral Candidate in 2019, Hands out Cash to Church-Goers

Willie Wilson, a Chicago resident and a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, recently was in the news. See this story, which is about a campaign event at which Governor Bruce Rauner and Wilson were on the platform together in a large church. After Rauner had left the building, Wilson told the audience that he wanted to help people with their finances, and handed out $300,000 in cash. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.

Wilson is currently suing the Democratic National Committee in U.S. District Court over how the national party treated him during his 2016 run for the Democratic nomination.

Some Tennessee Voters Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Appeal on How Many Votes are Needed to Pass a Constitutional Amendment

The Tennessee Constitution says, “If the people shall approve and ratify such amendment (to the Tennessee Constitution) by a majority of all the citizens of the state voting for Governor, voting in their favor, such amendment shall become a part of the Constitution.”

In 2014, an amendment concerning abortion was on the ballot, placed there by the legislature. It received 729,163 yes votes and 657,192 no votes. The state government declared that it had passed. The number of votes for Governor was 1,353,728; half of that number is 676,864.

Some opponents filed a federal lawsuit, saying the measure did not pass because the state did not show that a majority of people who actually voted for Governor had voted for the amendment. In order to show this, each ballot would have needed to be re-counted, to disregard votes on the amendment from people who abstained from voting for Governor. In other words, these voters take the meaning of the Tennessee Constitution to refer to particular voters. These voters won in U.S. District Court, but in January 2018, the Sixth Circuit reversed and said the measure passed.

Here is the cert petition. A great deal of the petition focuses on the procedural issue of whether it was wrong for the state officials to have filed their own lawsuit in state court, to get a favorable ruling on their side, instead of letting the federal court handle the case. The case is George v Haslam, 18-76 (although in the lower courts it was called George v Hargett).

Twenty Ohio Libertarians Make Use of New Procedure to Run for Partisan Office

The Libertarian Party of Ohio is the first party to use the ballot access procedures for newly-qualifying parties that the legislature passed in 2013. The party had first met the July 3, 2018 deadline for the party petition. That petition required 54,965 valid signatures, and was found to be valid.

Then, the law said by July 19, any candidate who wanted a Libertarian nomination was required to submit a petition of 50 signatures for statewide office, or five signatures for other office. Twenty Libertarians submitted such petitions. In no instance did more than a single Libertarian for any particular office submit a candidate petition, so all of them are now deemed nominated and will appear on the November ballot. If two Libertarians had submitted a candidate petition for the same office, then the law permitted the state party officers to choose the actual nominee, and the other person would not appear on the ballot.

The offices being sought are U.S. Senate, Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Auditor, Secretary of State, four US House seats (districts 5, 10, 14, and 15), one State Senate seat, seven State House seats, and three partisan county offices.

The Green Party is also on the ballot, but it is not a newly-qualifying party, so it nominated this year by primary in May.

One of the paradoxes of the 2013 law is that newly-qualifying parties can choose candidates who emerge as late as July. Yet the independent candidate petition law requires that all non-presidential independents must submit petitions by the day before the May primary (the primary is in May in midterm years and March in presidential years). In 2005 the Sixth Circuit had upheld the independent candidate deadline on the grounds that it wouldn’t be fair if independents could decide to run for office later than the date parties nominated candidates. That decision was Lawrence v Blackwell, 430 F.3d 368. It now appears to be obsolete.

Independent Candidate Files Brief in Illinois Case Against 5% of the Last Vote Cast Petition Requirement for U.S. House

On July 20, the plaintiff filed this brief in U.S. District Court, asking for summary judgement, in Gill v Scholz, c.d., 3:16cv-3221. This is the case that challenges the Illinois law that requires independent candidates for U.S. House to file signatures equal to 5% of the last vote cast.

This case was filed in 2016 and is still in U.S. District Court. If both sides ask for summary judgment, but the judge denies both sides, then there will be a trial.