U.S. Supreme Court Won’t Hear Ralph Nader’s Case Against Federal Election Commission

On December 2, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed it will not hear Nader v Federal Election Commission, 13-556. The issue was whether Nader had standing to sue the FEC for its failure to enforce campaign finance laws. Specifically, the Democratic National Committee and its allies did not report their expenses in attempting to keep Nader off the ballot in 2004 in two dozen states, and the FEC did virtually nothing to enforce the law. The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Nader doesn’t even have standing to sue the FEC.

This is the last chapter in the many lawsuits filed around Nader’s 2004 ballot access legal fights.

U.S. Supreme Court Sets Conference Date for Libertarian Party Presidential Primary “Sore Lose” Case

The U.S. Supreme Court has placed Libertarian Party of Michigan v Ruth Johnson, 13-421, on its list of cases to be considered at the December 13 conference. This is the case on whether Michigan’s Secretary of State should have kept Gary Johnson off the November 2012 ballot. Johnson appeared on the ballot in all states plus D.C. and Guam, except that he didn’t appear in Oklahoma because too many signatures were required, and he didn’t appear in Michigan because his name had been entered on the February 2012 Republican presidential primary.

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Virginia’s Appeal in Out-of-State Petitioner Case

On December 2, the U.S. Supreme Court revealed that it will not hear Virginia’s appeal in Judd v Libertarian Party of Virginia, 13-231. This is the case on the constitutionality of Virginia’s ban on out-of-state circulators.

Because the Libertarian Party has now definitely won this case, it is likely that a bill will be introduced in the 2014 Virginia legislature to repeal the ban. It is hoped that the Libertarian Party will be able to persuade the legislature to make other ballot access improvements in the same bill. The obvious flaw with Virginia’s ballot access laws is that the vote test for party status is excessive. The median vote test of the 50 states is 2%, but Virginia’s is 10%.

New Mexico Supreme Court Asks Secretary of State to Respond to Constitution Party Ballot Access Lawsuit

On November 26, the New Mexico Supreme Court asked the Secretary of State to respond to the Constitution Party’s ballot access that had been filed on November 25. The case is The Constitution Party of New Mexico v Duran, 34431. The issue is whether the Secretary of State was correct when she disqualified the Constitution Party (and also the Green Party) in July 2013. Although the Court’s quick response does not guarantee that the Court will hear the case, the odds are good that the Court will accept the case.

The lawsuit was filed directly with the State Supreme Court; it has not been to any lower state court.

Decision in Hard-Fought Wisconsin Lawsuit on Photo Voter-ID Law Likely to be Out Soon

In 2011, the Wisconsin legislature passed one of the nation’s most severe laws concerning photo-ID for voters who vote at the polls. The new law has not been enforced yet and has been in litigation since 2011. The first federal lawsuit filed against the law, Frank v Walker, eastern district 2:11cv-1128, had a trial November 4-8, 2013, and post-trial briefs are due December 20. The case is before U.S. District Court Judge Lynn Adelman, a Clinton appointee. Unlike some other cases, this case has over a dozen voter-plaintiffs who make a compelling case that they cannot obtain the type of ID that the law requires, at least without a substantial cost and effort. Here is a New York Times editorial about the lawsuit. Here is a copy of the Complaint. Thanks to ElectionLaw@Moritz for that link.