Trial on Whether Arizona U.S. House Districts Aren’t Equal Enough in Population Begins Monday, March 25

On March 25, Monday, a 3-judge U.S. District Court will hold a trial in Harris v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, 2:12cv894. The issue is whether the state’s U.S. House districts are equal enough in population to be constitutional. See this story.

Another case pending against the Arizona U.S. House districts is moving much more slowly. That case, Arizona State Legislature v Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission, 2:12cv1211, concerns whether having an independent redistricting commission draw U.S. House districts is unconstitutional. The legislature argues that the U.S. Constitution, Article One, provides that only legislatures, and not independent redistricting commissions, can draw U.S. House districts. That case is still bogged down over the issue of whether 3 judges are needed, or just a single judge.

Prominent Michigan Republican Leaders Say They Intend to Change How Michigan Awards Electoral Votes

According to this story, influential Republicans in the Michigan legislature, and Ruth Johnson, the Republican Secretary of State, say they favor changing how Michigan awards electoral votes. The article seems to say that they may soon introduce a bill that will combine proportionality of the popular vote, and the vote within each district. There have been many proposals to determine how electoral votes are awarded, but this idea seems to be entirely new. There is a reference in the story to half-electors. Thanks to Thomas Jones for the link.

Lawsuit Against Anaheim At-Large City Council Elections Has Court Hearing March 26

Anaheim, California, has a population of 336,265, and is the largest city in California that still elects its city council entirely at-large. Last June a lawsuit was filed in state court, arguing that the at-large system violates California law that outlaws at-large local elections when it appears the at-large system results in poor representation for racial and ethnic minorities. Anaheim has only had three Hispanic city councilmembers in the last twenty years, but Hispanics are a slight majority of the population.

The case has a hearing on March 26. It is Moreno v City of Anaheim, 30-2012-579998, Superior Court, Orange County. The result of this hearing may be that the case is delayed while the city decides whether to abandon at-large elections. Plaintiffs want election by city council districts.

Meanwhile, Escondido, California, has settled a similar lawsuit and will switch from at-large elections for city council to districts. See this story.

South Dakota Secretary of State Expects Americans Elect to Still be on Ballot in 2014

Even though South Dakota HB 1018 has been signed into law, and even though it goes into effect on July 1, the South Dakota Secretary of State thinks Americans Elect will still be on the 2014 ballot. The bill lets a party dissolve itself. However, the Secretary of State’s office feels that for the Americans Elect Party to have a state chair in place, the national party would need to amend its national bylaws and give the national party to power to appoint state chairs. Then, Americans Elect’s national office would need to actually appoint a South Dakota state chair, and then both the state chair and the national chair would need to sign notarized statements, requesting that the party go out of legal existence in South Dakota.

There is no more national office for Americans Elect, and apparently no more officers. The corporation has been dissolved. So, HB 1018 will probably have no effect on Americans Elect for 2014, and any voter is free to register into Americans Elect and run in its primary. However, access to the primary ballot of Americans Elect requires that the number of voters registered “Americans Elect” would need to increase, because a petition to put a legislative candidate on the primary ballot needs the signatures of 5 registered Americans Elect voters, and a statewide candidate needs 250 signatures.

PPIC Poll of Californians Show Independent Voters Overwhelmingly Favor Creation of a New Major Political Party

On March 20, the Public Policy Institute of California released this poll, which covers many topics related to California government and elections. One of the questions asks if voters feel the Democratic and Republican Parties are doing an “adequate job”, or whether the nation needs a new major political party. See page 23.

The results are that 51% of California voters feel a new major party is needed, 39% feel the two old parties are doing an adequate job, and 10% don’t know. When the results are broken down, one sees that independent voters are much more likely to say a new major party is needed. The results for independent voters are: 68% feel a new major party is needed, 27% do not, and 6% don’t know.

Other parts of the poll show that Californians continue to be very supportive of the initiative process.