On January 26, twenty-five history professors filed this amicus curiae brief in the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment did intend Section Three to cover presidents.
12
On January 26, Arizona filed a notice of appeal in No Labels Party v Fontes, 2:23cv-2172. This is the case in which the U.S. District Court had ruled that No Labels Party has a freedom of association right to block candidates for Congress and partisan state office from running in its primary. The state also asked the U.S. District Court to stay its own opinion, and says if the U.S. District Court doesn’t grant a stay, the state will ask the Ninth Circuit to do so on an emergency basis.
Here is the state’s brief, asking for a stay.
Some Tennessee voters and voting rights organizations are currently suing Tennessee over the new law that requires signs at polling places on primary day, warning that only “bona fide” members of a party may choose that party’s primary ballot. Tennessee does not have registration by party and has always had open primaries, meaning any voter is free to choose any party’s primary ballot.
On January 24, the state filed its brief in defense of the law. It is entirely about procedure. It says the plaintiffs don’t have standing, and raises other procedural points, but says nothing in defense of the law itself. Plaintiffs argue that the law is vague. A principle of criminal law that laws describing crimes must be specific and clear. The case is Ashe v Hargett, m.d., 3:23cv-1256.
The Colorado Secretary of State has determined that the Forward Party petition for party status is valid. Colorado now has four qualified parties that hold themselves out as “centrsit”: Unity, Colorado Center, No Labels, and Forward.
Mr. Penn, husband of No Labels founder Nancy Jacobson, thinks there is a great opportunity this year.
Here is his interview in Politico.
Thanks to Gene Berkman for the heads up!