Seven New Jersey Voters File Federal Lawsuit to Stop Taxpayer-Funded Partisan Primaries

On March 5, seven New Jersey voters filed a lawsuit in federal court, arguing that the New Jersey Constitution is violated when taxpayers pay for partisan primaries. Four of the voters are independents, one is a Democrat, and two are Republicans. The case is Balsam v Guadagno, 2:14cv-01388. It was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Stanley Chesler, a Bush Jr. appointee. Here is the Complaint.

New Jersey lets independents vote in partisan primaries, but on primary day, if they ask for a major party primary ballot, they are then listed as major party members, and they must fill out a new voter registration form to regain their independent status. The plaintiffs who are registered Republican and Democrats say they only registered into the major parties so as to be able to vote in primaries, but they would rather not be members of those parties.

Ohio Secretary of State Removes Libertarian Party Statewide Candidates from the Libertarian Primary Ballot

On March 7, at the end of the business day, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted revealed that he has removed the Libertarian Party statewide candidates from the party’s primary ballot, including the gubernatorial candidate, Charlie Earl.

Apparently the basis was that the paid petitioner who collected the signatures didn’t fill out the part of the circulator form identifying his employer.

Although Ohio permits write-in votes in primaries, the deadline for anyone to file as a declared write-in candidate for the May 4 primary was 72 days before that primary, or February 23, so it is too late for the Libertarians to find anyone else to run for Governor in their primary. The deadline had been 60 days until 2010, when it was moved to 72 days.

With no gubernatorial candidate on the November ballot, the party will lose its status as a qualified party. The law requires a vote of 2% for the party to remain on the ballot. The party plans to challenge the March 7 ruling in federal court on due process grounds. UPDATE: see this story, which provides more details.

Lawsuits Are Pending Against Two States, and Parts of Three Other States, Under Section 3 of the Federal Voting Rights Act

This Bay State Banner story lists and explains ten lawsuits, in five states, in which plaintiffs are arguing that the state or jurisdiction intentionally discriminated against ethnic and racial minority voters, and therefore the little-used Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act applies. The cases are pending in Texas, North Carolina, and jurisdictions within Louisiana, Alaska, and Montana. Section 3 says that regardless of whether an area is covered by the formula in section 4 (which no longer exists, due to a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2013), the state or jurisdiction that discriminates intentionally is subject to preclearance, for certain kinds of election law changes.

Bernie Sanders Tells “The Nation” Magazine That He is Thinking About Running for President

The Nation has this interview with U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). Sanders says he is thinking about running for president and if he did run, he has not decided whether he would run independently of the Democratic Party, or participate in the Democratic Party presidential primaries. Thanks to PoliticalWire for the link.