On April 3, the Tennessee State & Local Government Committee defeated SB288. All three Democrats were opposed, as was one Republican, so the bill only had three votes, and four were needed. It is now very likely that a lawsuit will be filed to overturn the Tennessee law on how new parties get on the ballot. It is so restrictive, it has not been used since 1968. Tennessee is in the 6th circuit, so Tennessee is bound by the 2006 decision of the 6th circuit called Libertarian Party of Ohio v Blackwell. That decision struck down an Ohio law on the same subject that was more lenient, and had been used more often, than the Tennessee law.
On April 3, the Montana House Administration Committee passed SB96. It had already passed the Senate. It makes it illegal for non-residents of Montana to circulate an initiative petition, and it makes it illegal to pay initiative petition circulators on a per-signature basis.
On April 3, the Governor of Arkansas signed HB2367 and HB2353. The first bill gives the state its first statutory procedures for independent presidential candidates (a petition of 1,000 signatures). The latter bill reduces the number of signatures needed for a new party to 10,000, but decreases the amount of time to get the signatures from 150 days to 60 days.
On March 29, a U.S. District Court in North Carolina ruled that several North Carolina campaign finance laws are unconstitutional. North Carolina Right to Life v Leake, 5:99-cv-798, e.d.
The Court struck down a law that required North Carolina Right to Life to register as a “campaign committee,” because it is a corporation and the state felt that it was spending money to support or oppose the nomination or election of one or more clearly identified candidates. NCRTL argued that its expenditures were not for the purpose of supporting or opposing any specific candidate; instead NCRTL said its advertising was to advocate its own ideas. The Court found the North Carolina law to be unconstitutionally vague. The state law said that speech should be judged by its “essential nature” and made reference to whether a “reasonable person” would think the speech either did, or did not, advocate voting in a particular way.
The Court also struck another part of the definition of “campaign committee”, that it be deemed to have the purpose of being a campaign committee if it spent more than $3,000 in political advertising during an election cycle.
Wikipedia’s article on the National Popular Vote Plan can be seen here. It has a chart that shows the progress of the bills in each house of the legislature, which is more comprehensive than National Popular Vote Plan’s own site. However, as of April 3, the Wikipedia chart does not yet reflect that bill’s passage in Maryland.